Far below the radar of yesterday’s hot news and tomorrow's
birdcage lining is the humble truth of professional FSOs all over the world
getting up in the morning and getting on with their jobs. The fawning,
semi-accurate newspaper pieces extolling FSO service in dangerous places are
fading to two-paragraph op-eds, if even those.
The emailed/Skyped assurances and explanations to anxious friends and
family members have been proffered, misunderstood, explained and re-explained. There are no mobs howling, no guns firing, no
virtual terror, no genuine terror, no murder, just today’s queue of applicants
for the services to which most of them are entitled.
And what are we doing about that?
A totally arbitrary wander through the “Visa Wait Time” page
at travel.state.gov present posts where the wait for an ordinary B1/B2 visa
appointment – not the visa itself, just the opportunity to apply – ranges from one to 118 days. Now, math was never Madam’s strongest subject
so please correct her kindly if she gets this wrong, but aren’t 118 days almost
17 weeks? Aren’t 17 weeks about four
months? Madam’s mind boggles at the
number of desperate/disbelieving/dismayed/disgusted calls, emails, and
button-holings that every member of the embassy staff must receive every day,
begging for or demanding either an earlier appointment or a referral. She wonders if anyone in the building has
time to do anything – such as their actual assigned job responsibilities – other
than fighting to hold back this flood. She
wonders – although she probably doesn’t need to – how this issue makes the post
look in the eyes of the people they are there to serve.
More math
This post apparently processed about 40,000 NIV applications
in 2011. With, let’s say, 365 days per
year, 104 of which are weekend days, we are left with 261 weekdays of which
there might be, let’s just say, 30 holidays.
That makes for about 173 visa applications per working day. Even if the number of applicants increased by
15% in 2012, that still means less than 200 per day. Unless there is only one interviewing officer
working, Madam fails to grasp how the post can explain this to the public without
prompting outright derision, or if it even bothers to explain it to the Bureau
of Consular Affairs, an august but long toothless body that has not, in many
years, had the wherewithal to order a consular chief to get out of his/her comfy
chair and out from behind the computer screen, open the office door, roll up the sleeves, and
provide some of the customer service he/she is paid to provide. And in the meantime, set a decent example for the troops for a change, just because.
Sheesh, Madam mutters.
Go away for a little while, and when you come back it’s still as Mr.
King so rightly explained, SSDD.
3 comments:
So what's the post? Is it a politically motivated backlog, there on purpose?
Since this isn't the only post in such straits or even worse, it seems a bit unfair to name it. But a few seconds with travel.state.gov will reveal it quickly enough. Political backlog? Can't see why. Habitual, careless, nobody-anybody-cares-about-is-complaining-loudly-enough backlog? Could be.
Nice to see you blogging again.
Post a Comment